Not logged in
Login
The future of the airline markets, is hard to think about. What are they exactly looking for, big planes like the A-380 or smaller planes like the
7E7? Often people think bigger is better, not always. The A-380 is a giant, able to fit almost 555 passengers. Still how are they sure that all those
seats will be filled? Not only that but it would be better to look at the big picture. For example, after the 9-11 attacks, the airline markets
suffered a major blow. People unfortunately became afraid to fly. Now if a airline has a large fleet of A-380?s and a attack unfortunately happens,
and people are afraid to fly. I bet most of the seats on those planes will not be filled. Reducing the efficiency of the airline, and making them lose
money.
The two giants in the airline manufacturing industry Airbus and Boeing, have different ideas about how the future markets will look. On one hand
Airbus is expecting a great increases in air travel and for that they build the A-380. On the other Boeing expects airlines to go for smaller faster
aircraft like the 7E7. At the moment I can?t say how the markets will react to the A-380, but if they react to it in anyway like the 747 than there
may be some success for this plane after all. When it comes down to it, it really depends on the people. What do passengers want something fast that
will get you there quick. Or something large and is kind of like a flying hotel of sorts. If the 747 sales drop Boeing must not worry, because there
737 and 717 model are very good airplanes and have been proven to be successful. Also the 7E7 will be a great aircraft as well because, airlines may
like this plane for it?s efficiency and lower maintenance cost.


Very nice article Cruising! Get's to the point!
I agree, very nicely done.
And by the way, 300 airports worldwide could support the 747, but only 30 could support the A380.
*Based on 747 Brochure*
Boeing.com
lol, that could be true, or maybe just a way for Boeing to spread propaganda, but indeed the A380 is a monster and few airports will be able to support it.
Support, meaning the weight of the craft.
I beleive that boeing is telling the truth.
I personally will like the 747 the best.
Yea but when the 747 first came out, maybe only 30 airports supported it. ;)
But I agree, 747 is already legendary.
Well back to the point, why would 200+ international airports change their runways for the A380 if they still have the 747?
Why did 200 airports change their runway for the 747?
Because it's bigger and better.
They didn't! The 747 was just enough for the runway.
Oh okay. I was just guessing there. ;) I assumed that at the time the 747 would be like the A380 of today. Are you sure they didn't have to increase the Runway strengthen lllboy?
It didn't make then alter the runways, however later on they slowly strenthened the runways.
The A380 however, needs to have strenthened runways.
Oh, yea you were right. :D
What I did to get the image to show is to eliminate the space in the image url - like this:
http://www.electronicaviation.com/images/uploads/Commercial%20Aviation/8.gif
There was a space between "Commercial" and "Aviation" that is the problem. The bbcode doesn't seem to care for the space. ;)
I added the %20 to fill the space... which is what a browser would do naturally.
Check the thread over at XMB - I'll report this to Tularis and see if this can be fixed.

Ah I see! Thanks Daf!